The model is relatively sure of the bottom 3. With a binary value model it thinks
Contestant | Elim. Probability |
---|---|
Naima | 0.216 |
Paul | 0.278 |
Thia | 0.260 |
A continuous variable analysis is way more sure of Naima
Contestant | Elim. Probability |
---|---|
Naima | 0.448 |
Paul | 0.102 |
Thia | 0.079 |
My personal feeling is that the second predictions are better, and the significance is better anyway. Naima is toast, then Paul and Thia in a dead heat. This could change if the major scoring services change a lot. I don’t think that’ll happen. Bye Naima!